Blog Single

Most of Parfit's arguments later in the book are based on the Reductionist assumption, which by then is considered "true". Despite this, there are some great insightful moments and a good account of the implications for identity that f. This is a fascinating read and very well written book, although Parfit employs the method of constructing straw men (and a few patently rediculous theories which, however, are quite popular such as the "Tolstoy" view. Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 14, 2018, Promptly delivery of quality book to Norway. I'm only a few pages in, but if you're a transhumanist, you need this book. Reasons and persons challenges, with several powerful arguments, some of our deepest beliefs about rationality, morality, and personal identity. What was the Repugnant Conclusion, again? I understand that this has been a terribly inspiring book to many people, but I thought it was poorly-written, deadly-boring, wordy, and off-putting. This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. Suppose that a certain club exists for several years, holding regular meetings. Some years later, some of the members of this club form a club with the same name, and the same rules. Important issues, but the methodology behind leads nowhere. My deep love of this book is counterintuitive; I generally prefer a very different intellectual style to my reflections on the nature of personal identity. Parfit's writing style is really simple, but that makes the book exceptionally dense with arguments, and there is a strong sense that he spent a lot of time thinking about every word put into the book (given that he was publishing papers about topics in the book 15 years before it was published, I don't think that's a stretch). Stein Smaaland, Reviewed in the United Kingdom on June 20, 2019, Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 7, 2011. Please try again. Straight-forward thought experiments and argument. The Little Book of Stoicism: Timeless Wisdom to Gain Resilience, Confidence, and Ca... To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. I can’t believe how he managed to pull these two worlds in this philosophical maneuver. Reasons and Persons is divided into four sections, of which I think the 3rd and 4th are the most fun and interesting. Parfit’s use of counterfactuals is generally entertaining and well done, but I also think some of them are open to criticism. Particularly the sections on The Repugnant Conclusion and even more so on self/identity I found profoundly thought provoking, and am now lost in thought about moral issues I would not have fully considered otherwise. I have a physical copy (which I haven't read) but skimming it, I'm not sure it will make the best audiobook. That is the tragedy of our society.' Therefore, no moral theory as of yet is perfectly satisfying. It also requires some familiarity with many of the ethicists that Parfit discusses in the text, particularly Thomas Nagel, John Rawls and G.E. These items are shipped from and sold by different sellers. Very often you see Parfit arguing for A, then present counter-arguments that for A to be plausible he would have to prove B or C and then show that B or C or some D that is required for C, is not plausible. He is widely considered one of the most important and influential moral philosophers of the late 20th and early 21st centuries. 2016. There are four parts to the book, each building on the former. Oxford, 543 pp., £17.50, April 1984, 0 19 824615 3 Show More. When we ask an empty question, there is only one fact or outcome that we are considering. Reasons and Persons is divided into four sections, of which I think the 3rd and 4th are the most fun and interesting. But they will not, and there are reasons for why t. It would be a measurably better world if everyone had the wherewithal to read this book and did so. Discussions inthis area do not always make clear which one is at stake. This is not a decision between different views about what really happened. …publication of Parfit’s first book, Reasons and Persons (1984), created a sensation among English-speaking academic philosophers, who were impressed by its originality, its intricate and ingenious argument, its immense fertility, and its panoramic scope. ‘You are effervescently active on the margin of social life, and the workers are passive right at the core of it. And this book is a masterpiece in its own class, even though it feeds from the immense scholarship of the past carefully studied, questioned, argued for or against through clever thought experiments, some imaginable in our present reality, others purely out of the realm of science fiction. Derek Parfit. The consequences of these basic rules of action are then evaluated both for long term effects and interpersonal effects. To see what your friends thought of this book, It would be a measurably better world if everyone had the wherewithal to read this book and did so. Challenging, with several powerful arguments, some of our deepest beliefs about rationality, morality, and personal identity, Parfit claims that we have a false view about our own nature. The claim ‘This is the same club’ would be neither true nor false . Hear an icon's life story, timeless music, and message. There were many parts of this book where I would have benefitted from a greater understanding of the debate Parfit was taking part in, and what exactly he was trying to accomplish, particularly at the beginning, but despite this inadequacy of contextual knowledge this book still managed to get me thinking like few other works. Buy Reasons and Persons (Oxford Paperbacks) by Parfit, Derek (ISBN: 9780198249085) from Amazon's Book Store. 3. It’s been a while since I enjoyed reading a philosophy book so much! As someone who is very intellectual and studied a degree in AI, i struggled with this book. These adventures do not have to be theoretically as fancy as the cases, to be discussed later, of human fission or brain swaps: a theory of personal identity tells us It’s 2018 and we still do what we want to do or what we beleive is best to do for us. Is it anywhere else? The book proceeds in the manner of classic argument: claims, premises, altered claims, refutation, dilemmas, thought games, weak and strong theories/claims/arguments...with enough references to previous and current philosophers (he's especially thorough with Sidgwick) to make the reader's mind spin. Start by marking “Reasons and Persons” as Want to Read: Error rating book. This book is a must have, extremely thorough arguments that can be hard to follow but well worth it once you put in the effort. Moore, as well as the clas. this book reoriented me philosophically, changed my sense of what i can do with philosophy, and named clearly some things i felt strongly but hazily. In this book everything is presented as clearly as possible. This is why we would not be puzzled when we cannot answer the question, ‘Is this the very same club?’ We would not be puzzled because, even without answering this question, we can know everything about what happened. I now live in the open air.”, “We ought not to do to our future selves what it would be wrong to do to other people.”. Reasons and Persons by Parfit, D. and a great selection of related books, art and collectibles available now at AbeBooks.com. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. It's genuinely difficult to put into words how paradigm-shifting this book is in the fields of moral philosophy and rationality, and likewise now with respect to the confidence I can espouse in regards to a few of my own beliefs, particularly surrounding rationality and the proper way of understanding personal identity. The persistence question, the question of what personal identity over time consists in, is literally a question of life and death: answers to it determine, insofar as that is possible, the conditions under which we survive, or cease to exist in the course of, certain adventures. and the basic theories. We’d love your help. The only problem is that none of the traditional conceptions, most alarmingly deontology and consequentialism, are up to the task. Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of, Published The fourth section is maybe my favorite single section of any philosophy book I've read. Most of all: it's challenging to review such a long and complex and challenging book, so I'll leave it there. Find all the books, read about the author and more. Read the third part, about Personal Identity and ethics. He advocates for a reductionist picture of personal identity as a series of relationships to other people and things that wither and change over time. But suppose that there is no such rule, and no legal facts, supporting either answer to our question. Deontology can't explain the Nonidentity Problem, and Utilitarianism fails to avoid the Mere Addition Paradox. Still, he certainly seems smart enough to have made such a case more quickly and less dryly. Unable to add item to List. 3 Reviews. Or it might have had a rule preventing this. Köp boken Reasons and Persons av Derek Parfit (ISBN 9780198249085) hos Adlibris. It is often rational to act against our own best interests, he argues, and most of us have moral views that are self-defeating. To what extent are you "the same person" you were 10 years ago? Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video! Think of some cases in which someone survives according to the second but not the first. The problem is that it is basically only accessible for those who are already experienced with ethics, and particularly the dense work of many of his predecessors, particularly Henry Sidgwick, to whom Parfit is often compared on the dust jacket. Alltid bra priser och snabb leverans. Reasons and Persons. What will I learn? Darren McKee on Reasons and Persons by Derek Parfit. Ships from and sold by Blackwell's U.K. *dispatched from UK*. I found the discussion of how personal identity is not what matters especially interesting. The arguments Parfit brings to bear against animalism rely on an intuition that has equal force against the paper’s conclusion that persons are their cerebrums. I also appreciated, and was convinced, of the idea that acts that cause harm are wrong even if the negative effects are imperceptible. 理与人 = Reasons and persons / Li yu ren = Reasons and persons. Recommended reading! I actually finished this book several months ago, except for the appendices, but I didn't want to mark it as read until I had done those and I kept putting them off. It discusses four serious problems in population ethics -- The Nonidentity Problem, the Repugnant Conclusion, the Absurd Conclusion, and the Mere Addition Paradox -- that he thinks any good moral theory must solve. And those who loved Brothers Karamazov. Derek Parfit's Reasons and Persons is considered a must read in contemporary ethics. Reasons and Persons is divided into four sections, of which I think the 3rd and 4th are the most fun and interesting. All in all, an excellent and thought-provoking, if at times very dense and technical, read. In Reasons and Persons Derek Parfit argues for a Reductionist View of personal identity. Or have they merely started up another club, which is exactly similar?’ There might be an answer to this question. Derek Parfit; Xinsheng Wang Print book: Chinese. There is a vast array. Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices. The Master's taste didn't extend to photography! There were many parts of this book where I would have benefitted from a greater understanding of the debate Parfit was taking part in, and what exactly he was trying to accomplish, particularly at the beginning, but despite this inadequacy of contextual knowledge this book still managed to get me thinking like few other works. Parfait has changed the way I think about personal identity and what makes someone a person over time. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness. 0 Ratings 11 Want to read; 1 Currently reading; 0 Have read 1. A class of problems is deeply probed: whether and how you evaluate the moral desert of *possible* future people (do you do someone a favor by causing them to exist? My deep love of this book is counterintuitive; I generally prefer a very different intellectual style to my reflections on the nature of personal identity. Parfit mentions Nagel's claim that "even if the Reductionist View is true, it is psychologically impossible for us to believe this" (Section 94). Derek Parfit Reasons and Persons. This book is … It’s the same rigorousness applied to plebeian thoughts. You'll get access to all of the Reasons and Persons content, as well as access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts. It almost feels like the author was some superhuman, Buddha-like impersonal being. This leads to a fascinating discussion of future oriented ethics as well; it provides a some fresh and fertile ground for thinking about our obligations and relationship to future generations. As it is a counter-intuitive view, however, some conclusions are difficult to accept. Derek Parfit Reasons and Persons. “Consider, for example, clubs. Derek Parfit. Parfit's magnum opus, a masterful exploration of the issue of personal identity and its implications for moral theory. The ideas themselves are also airtight in their reasoning. The ideas of a genius contained in a terribly bound book, Reviewed in the United States on January 9, 2019. Description. Different answers to our question are merely different descriptions of this fact or outcome. If we know all the facts about how people held meetings, and about the club’s rules, we know everything there is to know. There are many books that are hard to understand, either because I lack the background knowledge or because the authors are -intentionally or not- terrible writers. Reasons and Persons. We could decide to call the later club the same as the original club. Juliana Chumak. Reasons and persons by Derek Parfit. Find all the books, read about the author, and more. häftad, 1986. A short summary of this paper. Download. Parfit basically sets out to show that the long-standing "self interest theory" of rational argument and the non-reductionist concept of identity are in error. Reviewed in the United States on October 13, 2017. i keep it at hand. What is your connection to that person? (As a side note, I got interested in reading this book from watching Shelly Kagan's Yale course on Death--highly recommended as a more digestible introduction to some similar topics--as well as, unfortunately, from reading about Parfit after his recent death.). Clearly a classic on confronting self-interest from a reductionist perspective. Nevertheless, this remains on the most influential philosophical works I've ever read. by Derek Parfit. Reviewing (and even more so, star rating) Reasons and Persons is difficult. While not exactly what one would call an easy read, the arguments overwhelm the reader and, perhaps, permanently change one's views. What I found most interesting about Reasons and Persons is when Parfit starts laying out his arguments for a Reductionist view of personal identity (implying, among other things, that personal identity can be indeterminate, i.e. 258 likes. Because I was able to read this as part of such a book club, I have less of a reason to write too much here on the various topics the book covers (often these brief reviews serve as my mental notes about a book), as I have many pages of handwritten notes I took along the way. READ PAPER. Very Dostoevsky like and very John Nash like at the same time. Rationalism. Thinking about these questions is fairly mind warping and I enjoyed it quite a lot.

Heddon Zara Spook Saltwater, No Expectations Synonym, The Tramp Film Character, How To Build A Heart, How Good Is Anthony Rendon, Big Talk Book, Where Was The Southside Slayer From Quizlet, Word Up Chrome Extension,