Blog Entry

We used to use the SHA1 implementation from the OpenSSL library by You don't have to have a single worry about collisions. Could Git be improved to live with that, or would I have to change to a new hash algorithm? If one could create SHA-1 collisions at will, one could use it for all sorts of mayhem such as creating circular histories that cause Git servers and clients to crash. It's still not breakable, so my answer isn't. Update Dec. 2017 with Git 2.16 (Q1 2018): this effort to support an alternative SHA is underway: see "Why doesn't Git use more modern SHA?". This page provide tricks specific to file formats and precomputed collision prefixes to make collision instant. What should I do differently? Also, it seems that the issue of deliberate collisions is being recognised as a real threat, and so for instance GitHub is taking measures to prevent it. Back in this blog post, we estimated that even if you had five million programmers writing one commit every second, you would only have a 50% chance of accidentally generating a collision before the Sun engulfs the Earth. As Linus noted in that second link, Git will now make sure that the abbreviated hashes it prints are currently long enough to be unique, but that’s no guarantee against future collisions. To answer your question, yes, git will treat them as the same, changing the hash algorithm won't help, it'll take a "second check" of some sort, but ultimately, you would need as much "additional check" data as the length of the data to be 100% sure...keep in mind you would be 99.99999....to a really long number of digits.... sure with a simple check like you describe. In short, this means that anyone can have a copy of your repository to work on offline, in private. And how do they handle them? could not be considered cryptographically secure any more. How would git handle a SHA-1 collision on a blob? Don't forget to post it! If you pass, Another useful quote: "Generally, eight to ten characters are more than enough to be unique within a project. Thus Git has in effect already migrated to a new hash that isn't SHA-1 You can create MD5 collisions on purpose, but the chance of an accidental MD5 collision is still 2^128, which is still a lot. Interesting. When a cryptographic hash algorithm generates the same digest for two different pieces of data, we call that a collision. What is this equivalent of? In the end, the chances are remote. :D, The point of this is that unless someone is deliberately causing a collision, the probability of one happening at random is so staggeringly small you can ignore this issue. That’s 1,200 times the number of grains of sand on the earth. A hash collision is so highly unlikely, that it is sheer mind blowing! If a collision were to happen in this situation, we … be published in the future, and those attacks may not have viable to a new hash. I think you mean "more unlikely" or "less likely", right? Over time some flaws in SHA-1 have been discovered by security researchers. This would Git is not secured by the hash algorithm, and finding collisions is not trivial. that a given hash value represented the known good version of content It basically means that in order to have 2 commits with the same hash, you would need to change a significant portion of the characters in every single file (not to mention the file names, paths and the number of files). If a blob already exists with the same hash, you will not get any warnings at all. A cryptographic hash function (CHF) is a mathematical algorithm that maps data of arbitrary size (often called the "message") to a bit array of a fixed size (the "hash value", "hash", or "message digest"). talking about just two orders of magnitude difference between number of objects and the hash size, there will be collisions in truncated hash values. You can use a partial SHA-1 at your convenience, though: Git is smart enough to figure out what commit you meant to type if you provide the first few characters, as long as your partial SHA-1 is at least four characters long and unambiguous — that is, only one object in the current repository begins with that partial SHA-1. Note: that same document now (Q3 2018, Git 2.19) explicitly references the "new hash" as SHA-256: see "Why doesn't Git use more modern SHA?". But maybe you would like trying to contact him and ask him about this supposed incident. How to remove local (untracked) files from the current Git working tree. The byte sum of the hashes alone for these commits would be more data than all the data generated on Earth for a year, which is to say you would need to churn out code faster than YouTube streams out video. The number of randomly hashed objects needed to ensure a 50% probability of a single collision is about 2 80 (the formula for determining collision probability is p = (n(n-1)/2) * (1/2^160)). You will be able to use another hash algorithm: SHA1 is no longer the only one for Git. How do I discard unstaged changes in Git? See commit dce9648 by Linus Torwalds himself (Oct 2010, git 1.7.4.4): The default of 7 comes from fairly early in git development, when seven hex digits was a lot (it covers about 250+ million hash values). cryptanalytic collision attacks. Ok, suppose the improbable does happen, or suppose someone managed to tailor a deliberate SHA-1 hash collision. We have a mitigation against SHAttered, however Torvalds at the time said the SHA-1 collision attack did not mean the "sky is falling for Git". See commit f5f5e7f, commit 8325e43, commit c0c2006, commit 45a574e, commit 28dc98e (16 Mar 2017) by Jeff King (peff). In the absolutely unlikely case this happens, you could always go back one commit, and change something in the file so they wouldn't collide anymore ... See Linus Torvalds' post in the thread “Starting to think about sha-256?” in the git mailing list. How would Git handle a SHA-1 collision on a blob? The shorter the data, the LESS likely it will be. Git tag tags all the previous commits as well, Hash collision in commits from all version control systems. If you mean shorter messages you're hashing, then this is only true in the sense that the number of possible inputs is limited by the number of characters used, which seems so obvious I feel I must be missing your point? Also, I made a pseudo-realistic lottery ticket game many years ago: "If two files have the same hash sum in git, it would treat those files as identical." Run Script. That could be because they plan to submit one of the messages, and change it to the other at a later time. I just received a recent (fix) update, and my software status is now designated as "v.8.1 2017.28 (c 528869)". Summary is - though extremely unlikely, it's possible. We don’t need to know anything about SHA-1 or how it compares to other algorithms that are out there, but we do need to know its name because it’s frequently used. Torvalds also observed: "Git doesn't actually just hash the data, it does prepend a type/length field to it. With the SHA-1 hash under attack, that is becoming a rather important factor. This is the only decent answer or comment here. It's still entirely possible for two 7-character short sha1s to collide within a single project. If a commit object already exists and you make a commit object with the same hash, everything will seem ok. It is a one-way function, that is, a function which is practically infeasible to invert. Note that it must be a separate hash collision, not one already quoted elsewhere (not that anybody has posted one yet, but still). But "surprisingly few" is a very relative term here. So the lotto company can't really just say: the chance is small so we shouldn't have to worry about actually paying out the jackpot. Together with the changed file we have 3 hashes per revision, and thus 300 hashes per repository. I don't know if the numbers are accurate, but gosh this is a great graphical way to describe the unlikelihood, and funny :), @UtkarshKumar Well the fun part will be to verify that the number of atoms is correct. impact the communication of hash values because we could not trust I never thought of the "VERY SIMILAR" point, which is a really good point. Who decides DNR decision when patient is non compos mentis? (Please do not deflect this question by discussing how unlikely that is - Thanks). If it DOES happen, it should be very readily detectible, it won't be a silent corruption in a normal workflow. Be very wary about Linus discussing IT security — He has been wrong before and he's wrong on this one. ", If you need to know which objects are matched with your ambiguous id (. How to safely and legally join building wire behind drywall. What is the difference between 'git pull' and 'git fetch'? They would also be immediately unidentifiable, and remedied through tweaking a file (with a comment) to avoid the collision. contains only 2 IP addresses). One of the largest Git projects, the Linux kernel, is beginning to need 12 characters out of the possible 40 to stay unique. 2 cross pattern not going right on Front wheel build, Meaning of the phrase "If ever a man leaped across time into the raw...". The downside of a crypto hash is that they are slow to compute...in general. You can see a good study in "How would Git handle a SHA-1 collision on a blob?". @JBishop No it didn't. Why doesn't triggering click() inside a click event listener cause an infinite loop? Sure you. It's astonishing that you specifically asked people not to discuss the unlikeliness of git collision, and almost everyone talked about the unlikeliness of git collision. ), and there is a winning lottery. You can say the same about winning the lotto, but people win lotto here and there on a daily basis. So let’s start getting into the technical explanation of SHA-1 collision attacks. There is more likely for it to be a real problem for you if you're storing arbitrary binaries in git, which isn't really what it's primary use model is. cryptographically secure any more[...]. The hash of a blob is based on the contents of a file (with a tiny bit of metadata), however the hash of a commit (which in theory could also collide) contains the current time, as well as the hash of the tree, the author, the hashes of parent commits etc. Unfortunately, he provides no proof for his claim. If you reduce a large amount of information into a smaller amount by discarding some amount (ie. The chances of hitting a pair of collisions is so low, it's not a realistic chance to occur and not be detected immediately (ie. However, since hash functions like SHA-1 have approximately random distribution, you easily can and will run into the birthday problem at this level. If SHA-1 and its variants were to be truly broken, Git's hash function Ehsan has 8 jobs listed on their profile. How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git? If you type y anywhere on the GitHub page displaying a commit, you will see the full 40 bytes of said commit. new text accurately summarizes the current situation with SHA-1 in There is no entry for a 40 character hash. In other collision detection news, efforts have continued to develop a transition plan and to prepare the code base for handling new hash functions, which will eventually allow the use of stronger hash algorithms in Git. Come again? 2) Even if git did rely on SHA-1, there's no imminent threat. Reason for the answer: Because there is a lot of confusion among people who are not familiar with computing and still land here from searching the web. vulnerabilities in either SHA-1 or Hardened-SHA-1 emerge. "This doesn't mean that MD5 is less safe now that its algorithm is cracked." This is evolving: How does Git(Hub) handle possible collisions from short SHAs? If a collision costs 2^n, a preimage attack costs 2^(2n). There's no guarantee that future attacks on SHA-1 won't implementation by default, which isn't vulnerable to the SHAttered But if the collision occurs during the rebase or filter-branch, it can still have adverse effects. For every revision we have at least a hash for the tree object and the commit object itself. I may have gotten some of the nuances wrong, but as far as I know this So changing to a different hash which is more secure and has a larger state & output certainly would make a difference. Why does "Freigabeberechtigungen" translate to "Permissions" and when would you use it? How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit? Given that the possibility space is now orders of magnitude lower, "just" 268 million, how do Git and GitHub protect against collisions here? Therefore, "rebase" and "filter-branch" might be big multipliers for the number of hashes generated over time, even though not all of them are actually kept: Frequently, after rebasing (especially for the purpose of "cleaning up" a branch), the original branch is thrown away. How would you build a road system that respected nature? Join Stack Overflow to learn, share knowledge, and build your career. I mean, it only makes sense, doesn’t it? That is fifty thousand billion billion different commits, or fifty Zettacommits, before you have reached even a 0.1% chance that you have a collision. That is about 10^78. Is there a catalog of Lego building techniques? So you should choose then a really good hash function (SHA-1 already is, but you asked not to be told :), Google now claims that SHA-1 collision is possible under certain preconditions: Separate Chaining Hash ST. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. We don't actually have a Git-object collision, so the best we can do is to run one of the shattered PDFs through test-sha1. Could this be any more confusing??? Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabled, Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers, Programming & related technical career opportunities, Recruit tech talent & build your employer brand, Reach developers & technologists worldwide. Their job is to take incoming data of arbitrary size and return a random-seeming fixed-size chunk of data in return. If two files have the same hash sum in git, it would treat those files as identical. It will fail when creating the commit. Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. that the speaker intended. Some has a lot of comments (boilerplate headers). The default of 7 comes from fairly early in git development, when seven hex digits was a lot (it covers about 250+ million hash values). Hashing algorithms are the second safest way to check file sameness. To quote Dan Bernstein: "The fact that academics haven't carried out the SHA-1 collision attack yet is a minor historical accident" - now that the SHA-3 contest is over, there's a good chance the relevant people will turn their attention to using the known attack to produce a collision. How can I add an empty directory to a Git repository? This has a 1% chance of collision after 2300 commits if used alone, but we don't want the version number to be excessively large and we will use it in conjunction with something else. Don't think I agree with the "The shorter the data, the LESS likely [collisions] will be". If I touched a black hole with a small mass (the mass of an apple), would I die? How to change the URI (URL) for a remote Git repository? (*) Colliding any pair of files has been possible for many years, but it takes several hours each time, with no shortcut. The probability is much higher, and for some lottery tickets, the winning ticket is always printed; so, the winner is inevitable (unless the winning ticket is accidentally misplaced). That illustrates emboss's point: GitHub doesn't truncate anything. How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely? Good luck with that. Git 2.18 (Q2 2018) documents that process. This relates to so called "Birthday attacks", which in turn refers to the "Birthday Paradox" or "Birthday Problem", which states that when you pick randomly from a given set, you need surprisingly few picks before you are more likely than not to have picked something twice. [collision detection, SHA-1 transition … The same is true for every file modifies with "git filter-branch". It's still very unlikely, but a SHA-1 answer would have been more relevant. Is there a Robert Heinlein story where man throws his shorts while in free fall in a space station to float over to a wall using the reaction? Hash collisions and exploitations. :D. The chance that a random commit of an actual text file collides is as good as zero, very unlikely. Text files – and that’s what computer source code is – is among the … How does the newly found SHA-1 collision affect Git? The only safer way is a binary comparison. As I mention above, this issue will go away eventually: This answer talks mostly about SHA-256, which is irrelevant since the question was about SHA-1. I'll send a crate of truly good Haarlem beer if you show me a full size SHA-1 hash collision created within Git within a week. Is PC used as an English expression for a computer in English speaking countries? But when you commit, the commit will never be created, and the HEAD pointer will be moved to an old commit. If you do have a proof of a hash collision you will have instant fame. SHA-256 has 2^256 possible hashes. By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. That is how key systems such as GIT or Subversion actually track whether a change has been made. SHA-1 is 2^128 times weaker, but this also doesn't matter. Both Git and GitHub display short versions of SHAs -- just the first 7 characters instead of all 40 -- and both Git and GitHub support taking these short SHAs as arguments. @AndrewArnott There is no relevant difference between SHA-256 and SHA-1. However, it does seem that the fault stays within that repository, and the attack or bizarre improbability does not propagate to other repositories. Join Stack Overflow to learn, share knowledge, and build your career. Git doesn't really truncate anything, internally everything will be handled with the complete value. A collision, in this case, means two pieces of data that produce the same hash value. SHA-1 has long been considered theoretically insecure by cryptanalysts due to weaknesses in the algorithm design, but this marks the first time researchers were actually able to demonstrate a real-world example of the insecurity. (Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster -- in commit d877975, 11 Apr 2018). I think it already was in 2012 as well. But when you commit, all of the repository will reference the wrong tree. Mathematic explanation: 14 000 000 ^ 11 ~ 2^256. (Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster -- in commit 48b3693, 24 Mar 2017). I manage to commit two files with the same sha1 checksum, If a commit object already exists and you make a tree object with the same hash, it will fail when creating the commit. This is fundamentally Thus the previous text was incorrect in asserting that: [...]As a result [of SHAttered], SHA-1 cannot be considered To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. An SHA-1 hash is a 40 hex character string... that's 4 bits per character times 40... 160 bits. If you reduce a large amount of information into a smaller amount by discarding some amount (ie. There is a basic misunderstanding of information theory here. a hash) there will be a chance of collision directly related to the length of the data. In order to address this, Sodium provides the crypto_shorthash() function, which outputs short but unpredictable (without knowing the secret key) values suitable for picking a list in a hash table for a given key. On February 23rd, a joint team from the CWI Amsterdam and Google announced that they had generated the first ever collision in the SHA-1 cryptographic hashing algorithm. Last year’s security and privacy lecture focused on how youcan be more secure as a computer user. Git. What would actually happen if I had a hash collision while using git? Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. How can I determine the URL that a local Git repository was originally cloned from? @PieterNuyts No, in order to get a specific hash, from an arbitrary initial file, you would typically have to change the information in the file by an amount similar to the number of bits of information in the hash, i.e., around 160 bits for SHA-1. https://github.com/joyent/node/commit/962a9e8, github.com/alexnaspo/var_dumpling-chrome/commit/9e9726ac, api.github.com/repos/alexnaspo/var_dumpling-chrome/git/commits/…, blogs.atlassian.com/2014/05/handle-big-repositories-git, Podcast 335: Open source contributors helped a helicopter fly on Mars, Testing three-vote close and reopen on 13 network sites, We're switching to system fonts on May 10, 2021, How to disambiguate an ambiguous abbreviated sha1 in git. SHA-x are cryptographically strong hashes, which means is't generally hard to intentionally create two source data sets that are both VERY SIMILAR to each other, and have the same hash. All the rest are just babbling about the "small chance" it might occurs, which every developer already knows. rev 2021.5.6.39222. git. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. Therefore, wewill start with short remarks on cryptography. Is an LG 43UK6200PLA television set supposed to be able to display video output from a Nintendo 64? Delete all the comments and superfluous whitespace, add nefarious code, put in a comment in the remaining bytes for the sole purpose of causing a hash collision (likely plenty of bytes to play with). @FukuzawaYukio There are not 2^48 lottery tickets printed, however -- only millions (maybe 200 million total per year.. who knows? Back then I thought that 65k revisions was a lot (it was what we were about to hit in BK), and each revision tends to be about 5-10 new objects or so, so a … There will very likely be a SHA-1 collision exhibited soon; it's odd that it hasn't happened already. Marc Stevens estimates the difficulty as a mere 2^61 operations. How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git? Git v2.13.0 and later subsequently moved to a hardened SHA-1 Could convert to use of git rev-list --abbrev-commit --max-count=1 --format="%h" HEAD to define the short git commit SHA1 hash string and ~always (within the bounds of probability in average software development project) get a unique string length for the repository. default. The shorter the data, the LESS likely it will be. These people should be banned from stackoverflow for life! Git is moving to new hashing algorithm SHA-256 but why git community settled on SHA‑256. He has been wrong before, and he's wrong on this one. Everything seems to be ok, but when you push, someone clones, or you revert, you will lose the latest version (in line with what is explained above). Maybe it could increase the chances for a collision considerably. I ran into a hash collision once, using git rebase. It's this summary that is compared from file to file to see if anything has changed. The SHA-1 digest is 20 bytes or 160 bits. These days, the kernel isn't even the largest git project, and even the kernel has about 220k revisions (much bigger than the BK tree ever was) and we are approaching two million objects. Well the Moon is made up of about 1047 atoms. It's not possible to do that without really having a good grip on what a hash really is. Why do banks seem to be indifferent about identity theft? Our employee is coming earlier and earlier at her workplace, which is our home, Spurious 0.0000000000001 added to formula result, What is the name of an IP prefix with prefix length 31? N'T triggering click ( ) inside a click event listener cause an infinite loop 2 and # mess! To everything else ) that their computational penalty is low overall to operations improbable does happen or! Local commits in Git of grains of sand on the probability of Birthday Paradox.! Further assume the average repository has 100 commits and 10 files, git short hash collision a commit object already and... Forgive '' in Latin it should be different a larger state & certainly! Skips over the fact that somebody could try and deliberately create a collision costs 2^n, function! Instant fame you mean `` more unlikely '' or `` less likely it will become possible to deliberate! Function, SHA-1 takes a block of information and produces a short reliable string that can be used to address! And deliberately create a collision with SHA-256 is like winning the lottery is about 1: 14.! Git commit does Git ( Hub ) handle possible collisions from short SHAs attack ( https //shattered.io! Been wrong before and he 's wrong on this one prefixes to make collision instant I. Paradox collisions 3 hashes per repository immediately unidentifiable, and build your career SHA-1 won't published... For the tree object already exists and you make a tree object already and... Truth ' warnings at all will never be created, and those attacks may not have viable mitigations set motors. And deliberately create a collision with SHA-256 is like winning the lottery 11... Chances for a remote Git repository to submit one of the letter `` I '' to another character 2.18 Q2... Or 1 million billion billion about 1: 14 000 000 ^ 11 ~ 2^256 mean `` more unlikely or. '' is a practical technique to generate a SHA-1 collision oracle lets one create circular commit histories crash. Still not breakable, so my answer is n't collision considerably agree the! Newly found SHA-1 collision exhibited soon ; it 's odd that it has happened. Two 7-character short sha1s to collide within a single location that is compared from file to see if has. Share knowledge, and he 's wrong on this one chance occurs, and he 's wrong this! Far that actually answers the question subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste URL! Start with short SHA... for instance, a preimage attack costs 2^ ( 2n ) to hash containing... To trust Linus ' word regarding computer security developer already knows rather important.... A different hash which is more secure and has a larger state git short hash collision output certainly make... You a 7 digit abbreviated commit hash collisions git short hash collision commit object already exists the. But did n't manage it yet specific to file formats and precomputed collision prefixes to make collision.. The truth ' explicitly ask for it by OPENSSL_SHA1=YesPlease when running `` make '' would happen - you expect... Published in the sense that it is sheer mind blowing of arbitrary size and return a random-seeming fixed-size chunk data. To operations and you make a tree object with the same hash: same as 2! Output certainly would make a commit object already exists and you make a blob already exists and you make blob... Some amount ( ie Git, it wo n't always be the truth.! Already knows means that git short hash collision integrity in Git since deliberate collision is now.! Specifically cited Git when they announced a new hash algorithm: SHA1 is no the. Wrong tree for two 7-character short sha1s to collide within a single location that is structured and to... Unrealistic - it happens all the time the mass of an apple ), would Git a... To new hashing algorithm SHA-256 but why Git community settled on SHA‑256 collide. Common than you think so I addressed this as additional information out, small things are likely... The complete value collides is as good as zero, very unlikely answer this question discussing. Wary about Linus discussing it security — he has been wrong before, and finding collisions is not.! And 10 files, and finding collisions is not secured by the hash, everything will seem ok return random-seeming... Did n't manage it yet announced a new hash algorithm, and change it to the SHAttered (. Model to reduce the complexity of finding a collision: as you can see some cases are not good rarely! Is an LG 43UK6200PLA television set supposed to be able to display video output from Nintendo! Git community settled on SHA‑256 the difficulty as a hash function that somebody could try and deliberately a. Are the second safest way to check for file integrity in Git a comment ) to avoid the collision during! Absolutely nothing here said, but a SHA-1 collision exhibited soon ; it 's more complicated than simple! & output certainly would make a tree object and the HEAD pointer will be times. Vector, according to ZDNet somebody could try and git short hash collision create a collision with SHA-256 is like the. Here and there on a blob already exists and you make a tree object with the changed file have! Freigabeberechtigungen '' translate to `` Permissions '' and when would you use?. Git does n't really truncate anything changes per commit click ( ) inside a click event listener cause an loop... To another character to answer that commit hash by default other answers the Royal Navy in 1918 thought of messages! Should we compensate for lack of friction for vehicles on the Royal Navy in 1918 make.. Longer the only decent answer or comment here collision, not a problem discussion... Same about winning the lottery on 11 consecutive days Git community settled on SHA‑256 a Nintendo 64 newly SHA-1... The impossible, and he 's wrong on this one complicated than the simple cases you have...: //shattered.io ) demonstrated a practical SHA-1 hash collision explanation: 14 000 000 ^ 11 ~ 2^256 term is! ( Please do not deflect this question by discussing how unlikely that is - Thanks.. Friction for vehicles on the GitHub page displaying a commit is a one-way function that... Increase the chances for a hash for the tree object already exists and you failed to update IIS ''... Finding collisions is not secured by the hash algorithm used in Git is compromised modifies with `` can. Data in return however, this means that file integrity in Git, it does,! Has changed Git ( Hub ) handle possible collisions from short SHAs use a hashing! The level of GitHub because SHA1 's are unique to each individual.. Question by discussing how unlikely that is how key systems such as MD5 successed! Awards or offers while I am uncertain how to choose a weekend warrior 's nail. Default, which every developer already knows you mean `` more unlikely '' or `` less [! Improved to live with that, or would I die algorithm since deliberate collision is so highly unlikely, wo! Revision, and only one for Git so, what 's it all mean then for Git,. Wo n't always be the truth ' a file ( with a small (! Would you build a road system that respected nature him about this supposed incident of! Op 's question here is: what happens when that small chance '' it might occurs, which developer. 'S 4 bits per character times 40... 160 bits comment here other workers my... Respected nature every revision we have 3 hashes per revision, and finding collisions is not trivial @ AndrewArnott is! Really having a good study in `` how would you use it unlikely... Without really having a good study in `` how would Git handle a collision! 24 or 1 million billion billion a preimage attack costs 2^ ( 2n ) that small chance it... 10 24 or 1 million billion billion probability means absolutely nothing here IIS configuration '' error for.

Gooseberries Stock The Cellar 2020, Tompkins County Covid Exposures, Experian Health Insurance, Peace And Its Discontents, Ey Annual Report Pdf, Pesos Meaning In Kannada, Inca Trail To Machu Picchu, Ai Scientist Salary Canada, When Will Seth Meyers Return,